Human oversight, every tier
No client- or candidate-facing decision goes out without a named human’s approval — including in our highest-automation commercial tier.
ExploreThese are the commitments that hold across every SOS Global system, regardless of division or commercial tier. We’d rather state them plainly here than bury them in a footer link nobody reads.
No client- or candidate-facing decision goes out without a named human’s approval — including in our highest-automation commercial tier.
ExploreWhere our systems draw on personal or candidate data, it comes only from data you already hold and have lawful consent to use. No open-web scraping, ever.
ExploreWhere a placement or decision depends on a compliance status, it’s checked against the current, authoritative source at the point it matters.
ExploreEvery system includes a function whose job is to find the reason an output might be wrong — built in, not bolted on.
ExploreWhere multiple clients or licensees use the same platform, their data is structurally isolated from one another. No bridging, ever.
New capabilities and integrations run in a fully simulated mode until proven safe — nothing goes live against real data before it’s ready.
UK data protection law gives individuals specific rights where a decision is made about them by automated means alone. Our position across every division is the same regardless of what the law strictly requires: a named human reviews the case, has genuine authority to change the outcome, and is competent to do so — not a name attached after the fact to a decision the system already made. Where we say “human sign-off,” that’s what we mean by it.
We publish this stance because it’s the single most common question serious buyers ask before an NDA conversation even starts. If you need more — the specific review points, the escalation paths, the audit trail — that’s exactly the kind of technical detail we share directly under NDA.
Approved purposes, categories, sources, processors, access and retention.
Environment boundaries, access control, logging, incident handling and testing.
Inputs reviewed, exceptions, human action and accountable outcome.
Acceptance criteria, release approval, rollback and monitoring.
Owner, source, date, methodology and expiry for every material public claim.
It can be, when human review is genuinely meaningful — not a rubber stamp on an automated outcome — and when candidates are told plainly what role AI plays. SOS Global Recruitment requires a named human’s sign-off before any output reaches a client, in every tier.
No. All candidate sourcing works exclusively from a client’s own consented CRM — never the open web, and never a purchased list.
Through a dual-checkpoint model: every required item is checked once at screening, then re-verified against the current, authoritative source again on placement day. See recruitment compliance ↗ for the full detail.
These are commitments we hold ourselves to, stated plainly. If you’d like the underlying detail of how any of them is enforced — for due diligence, procurement, or framework audit purposes — we’re glad to share it directly under NDA.
Understand the controls behind evidence-led, human-accountable systems.
See the principles applied across recruitment and entertainment work.
Prepare operational evidence for changing AI governance obligations.
Configure evidence-led automation, bounded agentic workflows, exceptions and human authority around a defined business process.
Explore AI systems and business automation ↗Connect application, interview, verification and onboarding identity with proportionate fraud controls and review.
Use the candidate identity checklist ↗Apply identity, permissions, monitoring, intervention, revocation and audit to AI agents.
Use the governance framework ↗