Applicable law
Confirm the current duty, lawful route and accountable employer or controller.
A source-led control framework for connecting the person who applies, interviews, verifies, onboards and starts work—without allowing an automated fraud signal to become an unchallengeable decision.
Confirm the current duty, lawful route and accountable employer or controller.
Use the authoritative regulator, register, safeguarding or professional source.
Record what the hirer requires, what evidence it accepts and who can resolve exceptions.
Preserve identity continuity, evidence status, challenge and accountable progression.
| Checkpoint | Evidence and control | Exception requiring human review |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Application identity | Record the candidate-supplied identity, contact route, source, consent/privacy information and material changes. | Conflicting names, contact routes, unexplained duplicate profiles or material record changes. |
| 2. Application material | Keep the submitted CV, answers, portfolio and declared use of permitted AI tools as separate evidence. | Contradictory chronology, unverifiable claims or content that cannot be explained by the candidate. |
| 3. Interview identity | Define how the interviewer connects the person present to the applicant record without relying on appearance alone. | Unexpected participant, suspected prompting, voice/video inconsistency, substituted device or unexplained interruption. |
| 4. Remote impersonation and deepfake risk | Use proportionate liveness, challenge and escalation controls appropriate to the role and risk; document limitations. | Failed or inconclusive checks must stop progression rather than create an automatic accusation. |
| 5. Evidence integrity | Record issuer, source, date, document status and verification route separately from uploaded files. | Alteration indicators, mismatch, expired evidence or inability to validate against an authoritative source. |
| 6. Right-to-work interaction | Use the current Home Office route. A digital identity check does not remove the employer’s responsibility to follow the prescribed process. | No valid route, mismatch between result and candidate, time-limited permission or follow-up requirement. |
| 7. Pre-onboarding continuity | Reconnect the verified person, accepted offer, worker record, bank/contact changes and access provisioning. | Late identity or payment-detail change, new device/contact route or inconsistency with verified evidence. |
| 8. Human decision and audit | Name the reviewer, evidence considered, challenge made, exception outcome, decision, date and retention rule. | No consequential fraud or suitability conclusion should rest only on an AI flag or opaque score. |
Record the signal and source without prematurely labelling the candidate fraudulent.
Protect the process and candidate while preventing a questionable identity or document from advancing.
Recheck against the authoritative source or proportionate identity method.
An authorised person considers the context, correction route, evidence and next action.
Source set reviewed 19 September 2026. This operational resource is not legal advice.
SOS can implement customer-specific identity and fraud-control workflows around approved providers, risk policy and accountable review.