The next use of a television catalogue may not look like the original programme. Snips’ agreement with Banijay Rights points towards title-by-title mobile adaptation as a distinct rights and development proposition.
What the announcement says
Banijay says selected catalogue titles will be adapted into short vertical episodes for Snips. It says studios retain ownership of their intellectual property, the model is intended to create an additional revenue opportunity, and partners receive title-level aggregate data.
That combination matters: adaptation rather than simple cropping, retained ownership rather than an assumed transfer, and performance information attached to the title. It frames vertical distribution as a managed catalogue decision.
Not every title should become a vertical series
A catalogue contains different story engines, audience promises, rights positions and production legacies. Some titles may have highly adaptable character or conflict structures. Others may lose the qualities that made them valuable when compressed into a different format.
Adapt the engine, not only the aspect ratio
The development task is to identify what makes the original repeatable and then decide whether that engine survives shorter episodes, mobile framing and a different release rhythm. A technical reformat is not the same as a creative adaptation.
Treat rights as a design input
Underlying material, contributor agreements, music, archive, territorial restrictions and new AI-assisted work can all affect the proposed route. The rights review belongs before scale, not after a library has been processed.
Use data without surrendering judgement
Title-level performance data can inform the next decision, but it cannot explain every outcome on its own. Teams still need to interpret audience behaviour, creative execution, release conditions and commercial terms.
A disciplined catalogue review
- Identify titles with a repeatable mobile-first story engine
- Confirm ownership, permissions and territory before adaptation
- Define what must remain recognisable from the original IP
- Build and test a limited creative treatment
- Agree the distribution, data and revenue model
- Keep a human rights and creative approval before release
The commercial signal is real enough to investigate. The defensible opportunity belongs to rights holders and partners who can show why a title fits the form and how its value will be protected.
See how this market context connects to vertical drama and television content-track development before a project reaches the buyer room.
Sources reviewed
Commercial pathway: Explore SOS buyer-ready entertainment IP development.
Sitting on a catalogue and want to know what it's worth reformatted for vertical platforms?
Discuss your catalogue