Journey and decisions
Evidence states, exceptions, hard stops, challenge, accountable approval and audit activity.
Public interactive prototype · Synthetic data only
Follow an accountable recruitment journey through evidence, hard stops and human authority.
This simplified public prototype follows a fictional temporary nurse placement through the eight-stage SOS journey. It illustrates the control pattern without exposing proprietary scoring, agent instructions, thresholds, integrations or internal handoff logic.
Public demonstration boundary: what follows is an intentionally simplified, synthetic illustration—not a customer deployment and not the full SOS operating architecture. Exact rubric weightings, challenge criteria, decision thresholds, source connections, agent instructions, security controls and agent-to-agent handoffs are not published or embedded in this page. Qualified buyers can review controlled architecture material through the SOS NDA process.
Internal machinery
Weights, prompts, attack criteria, thresholds, orchestration, integrations and security configuration.
NDA architecture review
Deeper technical and commercial materials are shared only with qualified recipients under an appropriate NDA.
Placement state:
Authorise and classify the requirement
VERIFIED Fictional client, role, proposed start date and decision owner recorded.
CURRENT Applicable healthcare evidence categories and client-specific requirements identified.
The exact client configuration and internal rule mappings are protected and are not exposed in this public prototype.
Use an authorised candidate record
VERIFIED Amelia Hart is a synthetic profile associated with a consented demonstration record.
VERIFIED Source, consent purpose and material record changes are separately logged.
No LinkedIn scraping, third-party enrichment or real candidate data is used here.
Show both the case for and the case against
Build case: recent temporary-care experience and evidenced acute-setting duties align with the fictional role.
Challenge case: the latest manual-handling evidence expires before the proposed start date and one client-required declaration is absent.
Arbiter outcome: do not reject the candidate and do not progress silently. Carry the unresolved evidence into the compliance hard stop.
Mixed evidence cannot become a composite pass
CURRENT Synthetic professional-registration and right-to-work states are recorded as current at this checkpoint.
MISSING Client-required occupational-health declaration.
EXPIRED Manual-handling training before the proposed start date.
Automatic progression is blocked. The named reviewer can require correction or reject progression; the reviewer cannot turn missing evidence into a pass.
Corrections are checked before the gate clears
VERIFIED Synthetic declaration: issuer and accepted format recorded.
CURRENT Synthetic replacement training: completion date, expiry date and checker recorded.
Jordan Lee, synthetic compliance reviewer, records the corrected evidence and clears only this checkpoint. Underlying providers, validation rules and thresholds are intentionally not disclosed in the public page.
A rationale reaches a person—not a black-box score
Match rationale: the fictional candidate meets the defined role evidence after correction.
Independent challenge: recency, availability and unresolved evidence were tested; no remaining blocking objection is recorded.
Named human decision: Alex Morgan, synthetic recruitment lead, approves presentation to the fictional client. Internal rubric weights and challenge instructions remain protected.
Capture structured feedback and preserve the route back
The fictional client accepts the candidate after structured interview feedback. A decline could return the requirement to sourcing or the candidate to the authorised pool without erasing the earlier record.
Re-verify what can change before the start
VERIFIED Synthetic terms and placement authority recorded.
CURRENT Professional registration, right-to-work state and refreshed training rechecked for the defined start date.
VERIFIED No unresolved exception remains. If any agreed placement-critical item failed, the placement would remain stopped regardless of urgency.
This is a distinct second checkpoint—not a reuse of the earlier screening result.
First shift confirmed; monitoring remains active
READY Named human sign-off is captured for this synthetic role, client and point in time.
VERIFIED Fictional first shift confirmed as worked.
MONITORED Credential refresh dates and any time-limited evidence remain scheduled. A later lapse can reopen the hard stop after placement.
READY is not permanent clearance and this prototype is not a substitute for agreed authoritative sources or a customer-specific implementation.
What this illustrates
An inspectable public control pattern—not a claim of customer deployment or disclosure of the proprietary engine.
Hard stops remain hard
Missing or expired placement-critical evidence blocks progression instead of disappearing inside an overall score.
Challenge precedes approval
The match case and the objection are both preserved before a named person authorises the next consequential step.
Checks can reopen
Placement-day re-verification and ongoing monitoring recognise that evidence can change after an earlier pass.